Podcasting Chat Community

@luciedigitalni

If at all possible.

Charles will, of course, have no 'connections' through to the senior judiciary so he will be completely incapable of influence.

@RaymondPierreL3

You are more generous than I Raymond.

This fellow is where he is because he exploited his social position for a level of self indulgence that normal people cannot really even begin to consider.

Andrew's only skill seems to have been to have chosen his parents very well.

I wholeheartedly agree as regards the legal system and as you infer it will be interesting to see how it develops.

@maudenificent

Another interesting aspect is the way Chigger has tried to deal with this.

I think it's quite fair to guess that he was aware of at least the essence of this but he did nothing until it became public knowledge.

He has penalised Andrew, not for being a paedophile, but for being found out.

There is also now a real question regarding succession.

The theory that places Chigger on the throne doesn't take anything other than his genetics into account, and the same applies to rAndy.

If he can be sacked for being a bastard then so can any of them or perhaps the lot en mass.

One of their predecessors, the first Charles was a bit of an embarrassment and a solution was found which silenced him very effectively.

The French, of course, made this into a production line and I personally have no objection to following tradition in this matter.

@luciedigitalni

As you will have gathered I am a strict traditionalist in these matters and I think that precedence should be applied with firm rigour.

King says ‘law must take its course’ after Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s arrest

Former prince released under investigation as searches continue at the Royal Lodge in Windsor

the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

Excuse me for a moment whilst I check the meaning of the word schadenfreude ...

#NotMyKing