This needs to be shared on its own for visibility.
-
@killyourfm It’s shouting into the wind, I appreciate, but the simple rule should be that any *actual* journalist just shouldn’t use AI. At all. Ever. At least not for anything relating to an article.
I remember being at uni in 2000 and watching the journalism course student and dreading for the state of News once they were in charge. Now they are, and I was right to worry.
@wiredfire @killyourfm What is doubly-distressing about this particular incident is that it was done by a journalist/author who was known previously for being knowlegable, cautious and careful.
Someone I (previously) personally trusted, seemingly succumbed to a time-pressure-induced brain-fart.
-
Right after I unfollowed them for spamming my feed with AI ads...
@Kingu @killyourfm I did the same thing! They're just a big tech ad platform now. No real journalism for a good while.
-
@Kingu @killyourfm I did the same thing! They're just a big tech ad platform now. No real journalism for a good while.
They add their chance!
They failed
-
@killyourfm It’s shouting into the wind, I appreciate, but the simple rule should be that any *actual* journalist just shouldn’t use AI. At all. Ever. At least not for anything relating to an article.
I remember being at uni in 2000 and watching the journalism course student and dreading for the state of News once they were in charge. Now they are, and I was right to worry.
@wiredfire @killyourfm yes this journalist needs to be axed.
-
This needs to be shared on its own for visibility. It’s difficult to trust Ars Technica after this. I respect for publishing this but…
Frankly it’s getting increasingly difficult to trust any news source.
In the journalism world, fabricated quotes is an egregious offense.
https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/editors-note-retraction-of-article-containing-fabricated-quotations/@killyourfm I'm still a supporter of Ars. The fact that they published such a large, public retraction like this is a good sign. Most publications would just revise the article and maybe put a footnote on the bottom that they "fixed some inaccuracies."
This gives me hope that Ars will continue to be a solid source of tech news.
-
This needs to be shared on its own for visibility. It’s difficult to trust Ars Technica after this. I respect for publishing this but…
Frankly it’s getting increasingly difficult to trust any news source.
In the journalism world, fabricated quotes is an egregious offense.
https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/editors-note-retraction-of-article-containing-fabricated-quotations/@killyourfm the only thing left to do is fire the offender. This is required to reinstate trust.
-
@wiredfire @killyourfm What is doubly-distressing about this particular incident is that it was done by a journalist/author who was known previously for being knowlegable, cautious and careful.
Someone I (previously) personally trusted, seemingly succumbed to a time-pressure-induced brain-fart.
@shelldozer @wiredfire @killyourfm this person has to go.
-
@killyourfm I'm still a supporter of Ars. The fact that they published such a large, public retraction like this is a good sign. Most publications would just revise the article and maybe put a footnote on the bottom that they "fixed some inaccuracies."
This gives me hope that Ars will continue to be a solid source of tech news.
@jaye @killyourfm my fear is that more slop is/will be pushed without being detected.
-
@jaye @killyourfm my fear is that more slop is/will be pushed without being detected.
@f4grx @killyourfm By then making such a big deal about it, shedding more light on it, I don’t think that’s going to result in more slop. At least that’s my hope.
-
@f4grx @killyourfm By then making such a big deal about it, shedding more light on it, I don’t think that’s going to result in more slop. At least that’s my hope.
@jaye @killyourfm let's hope so.
-
@shelldozer @wiredfire @killyourfm this person has to go.
@f4grx @wiredfire @killyourfm I'm not sure I could be that hardline in this case, but I am feeling conflicted. Gaaaaargh.
-
This needs to be shared on its own for visibility. It’s difficult to trust Ars Technica after this. I respect for publishing this but…
Frankly it’s getting increasingly difficult to trust any news source.
In the journalism world, fabricated quotes is an egregious offense.
https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/editors-note-retraction-of-article-containing-fabricated-quotations/@killyourfm I can’t trust anything I read online these days to be trustworthy or believable.
Living offline out in nature seems to be better for my health.
️ -
@killyourfm I can’t trust anything I read online these days to be trustworthy or believable.
Living offline out in nature seems to be better for my health.
️@SamuraiSakura Jon, that sounds like paradise. It reminds me of last year when I spent nearly 3 months hiking across Oregon and didn't pay any attention to world news, tech news, or politics.
It was blissful.
-
@SamuraiSakura Jon, that sounds like paradise. It reminds me of last year when I spent nearly 3 months hiking across Oregon and didn't pay any attention to world news, tech news, or politics.
It was blissful.
@killyourfm Yes, you inspired me through all your posts.
I made a decision at the start of the year to live more offline and turn off online as much as I can.
-
This needs to be shared on its own for visibility. It’s difficult to trust Ars Technica after this. I respect for publishing this but…
Frankly it’s getting increasingly difficult to trust any news source.
In the journalism world, fabricated quotes is an egregious offense.
https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/editors-note-retraction-of-article-containing-fabricated-quotations/@killyourfm Yeah, this was a major screw up by @arstechnica (I’m a subscriber), but I feel they owned the screw up, at least.
Idk, what lead to this happening, but if a LLM is being used anywhere in the process, this could happen; the only way out is a hard ban on LLMs (unless reporting on LLMs) and banning the people who use them. Which can bring its own set of problems of detection and such
-
@wiredfire @killyourfm yes this journalist needs to be axed.
@phillycodehound @killyourfm And thrown into the Total Perspective Vortex!
-
@f4grx @wiredfire @killyourfm I'm not sure I could be that hardline in this case, but I am feeling conflicted. Gaaaaargh.
@shelldozer @wiredfire @killyourfm if Ars had rules as clear as described in the retractation, then this is a simple fuck around / find out kind of situation. Since the consequence is the credibility of a well established publication, I think that person should take full responsibility.
-
P Seth of the Fediverse shared this topic
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register LoginWelcome To Podcasting.Chat!
This forum is for podcasters, podcast guests, and podcast enthusiasts alike to share tips, tricks, and their love of the medium.
This forum is fully federated, so you are able to contribute to any discussion here through your own software of choice (e.g. Mastodon, Misskey, Lemmy, Piefed, etc.). So you can sign up for an account here and it federates around the Fediverse. You can also follow feeds and topics from your other Fedi-enabled accounts.
Recent Posts
-
@cheryanne @aj @n_dimension @nick_rogers
Goodo ... will do a search
-
‘This philosophy doesn’t merely counsel paying attention to what readers respond to—something any sane 21st-century journalist does; it essentially makes the data your editorial staff.
I don’t believe in this inevitability. As a reader of many distinctive publications, I _want_ to be led by them.’
The ‘Washington Post’ Leaders Missed the Point
The editor of the recently scrapped Book World believes in serving subscribers, not data.
The Atlantic (www.theatlantic.com)
-
That's terrific - I only achieved 8/10 which I'm still pleased about considering my recent efforts.
️️️
️️️️️️
-
@MyView I remember him announcing he will run as a candidate
